I imported a 401(k) planner from JaxWorks Small Business Spreadsheet Factory, and the file rendered just as well in OpenOffice as in Excel. While you can't work on a spreadsheet with someone else concurrently, you can modify and exchange back and forth with an Excel user and feel fairly confident that all will work as it should. OpenOffice's Calc spreadsheet does a good job of reading and writing Microsoft's Excel files directly. If you need a serious word processor and don't want to pay much, check out OpenOffice. Quibbles are minor and small, but the price is even smaller: $0. These more advanced features don't always translate well among different programs, so be aware. Normal academic-support tools are included, such as headers, footers, cross-references and a bibliographic database. LibreOffice and Microsoft Office call the tool Track Changes, but the name difference doesn't cause any problems in the function across all three similar suites. OpenOffice does support Track Changes, but calls the features Changes (Edit > Changes > Record). But if your ideas include wrapping text above, around or below images and graphics, OpenOffice is less flexible than the other two options. If you want tight control over the look and feel of your documents, you should have no trouble finding the tools you need. For example, in Writer, the word counter shows up in the document's status bar you don't have to tediously invoke it from a menu option, as still required in OpenOffice.Styles, Themes, clipart Gallery and the Navigator are nearly identical between OpenOffice and LibreOffice. The look and feel haven't shifted at all, and they've wisely kept many minor interface updates that made sense. The LibreOffice folks haven't undertaken any radical reworking of the program. Version 4.1 is at about the same level of change: incremental, if generally positive. docx cross-compatibility and the ability to attach comments to ranges of text were useful, the ability to use Firefox Background Themes as a skinning mechanism for LibreOffice was frivolous at best. For instance, although the improvements to. The changes were mostly incremental or trivial. LibreOffice 4.0, which debuted back in February, didn't quite seem like a 4.0 product.
In response, LibreOffice was spun off by former OpenOffice project members who wanted to give the software a better home and a more predictable release schedule (every six months). The reigning champ: LibreOffice 4.1 It's somewhat astonishing how quickly LibreOffice grabbed the spotlight from its older brother, but at least some of the blame belongs to the way OpenOffice changed hands multiple times - Sun, then Sun/Oracle, then Apache - with the project's directions handled rather autocratically at times. Challenging LibreOffice's spanking new version 4.1, Apache OpenOffice 4.0 boasts a splashy in-document user interface, hundreds of bug fixes, and many more features big and small. Libre had commandeered a sizable portion of the OpenOffice developer base, introduced a faster revision cycle, and attracted a large number of users, thanks in part to LibreOffice now being the default productivity suite for many Linux distributions.īut OpenOffice has staged a comeback, with a new revision to the left of the decimal point.
While the two share a common code base and similar missions, they differ in their feature sets and the licensing for their source code.įor some time, LibreOffice seemed to have taken the crown from OpenOffice. Lately, though, OpenOffice - formerly of Sun/Oracle, now under the aegis of the Apache Foundation - has taken a backseat to LibreOffice, an upstart spun off from OpenOffice's own source code.
Once, whenever you referred to the free productivity suite that competes with Microsoft Office, people knew exactly which program you were talking about.